MYTH OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM, THE - MAKING SENSE OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

This book is a welcome addition to the debate over 'judicial activism.' Constitutional scholar Kermit Roosevelt III offers an elegantly simple way to resolve the heated discord between conservatives, who argue that the Constitution is immutable, and progressives, who insist that it is a living document that must be reinterpreted in new cultural contexts so that its meaning evolves. Roosevelt uses plain language and compelling examples to explain how the Constitution can be both a constant and an organic document.